4.6 Review

Measurement of Perceived Risk of Developing Diabetes Mellitus: A Systematic Literature Review

期刊

JOURNAL OF GENERAL INTERNAL MEDICINE
卷 38, 期 8, 页码 1928-1954

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s11606-023-08164-w

关键词

Perceived risk; Perceived susceptibility; Diabetes; Health behavior theory

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This systematic review explores the measurement of perceived risk of developing type 2 diabetes among individuals without diagnoses and examines the use of theories, models, and frameworks in assessing perceived risk. It identifies heterogeneous approaches and limited use of theoretical frameworks, highlighting the need for standardized measures and consideration of context and target population.
BackgroundThis systematic review describes approaches to measuring perceived risk of developing type 2 diabetes among individuals without diagnoses and describes the use of theories, models, and frameworks in studies assessing perceived risk. While a systematic review has synthesized perceived risk of complications among individuals with diabetes, no reviews have systematically assessed how perceived risk is measured among those without a diagnosis.MethodsMedline, PubMed, PsycINFO, and CINAHAL databases were searched for studies conducted through October 2022 with measures of perceived risk among adults >= 18 years without a diabetes diagnosis. Extracted data included study characteristics, measures, and health behavior theories, models, or frameworks used.ResultsEighty-six studies met inclusion criteria. Six examined perceived risk scales' psychometric properties. Eighty measured perceived risk using (1) a single item; (2) a composite score from multiple items or subconstructs; and (3) multiple subconstructs but no composite score. Studies used items measuring comparative risk, absolute or lifetime risk, and perceived risk without defining how each differed. Sixty-four studies used cross-sectional designs. Twenty-eight studies mentioned use of health behavior theories in study design or selection of measures.DiscussionThere was heterogeneity in how studies operationalized perceived risk; only one third of studies referenced a theory, model, or framework as guiding design or scale and item selection. Use of perceived lifetime risk, absolute risk, or comparative risk limits comparisons across studies. Consideration of context, target population, and how data are utilized is important when selecting measures; we present a series of questions to ask when selecting measures for use in research and clinical settings. This review is the first to categorize how perceived risk is measured in the diabetes prevention domain; most literature focuses on perceived risk among those with diabetes diagnoses. Limitations include exclusion of non-English and gray literature and single reviewer screening and data extraction.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据