4.5 Article

Aqueous Extract of Sparganii Rhizoma and Curcumae Rhizoma Induces Apoptosis and Inhibits Migration in Human Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma

期刊

JOURNAL OF FOOD BIOCHEMISTRY
卷 2023, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

WILEY-HINDAWI
DOI: 10.1155/2023/6564124

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Sparganii Rhizoma and Curcumae Rhizoma (SRCR) are natural herbs used in traditional Chinese medicine to treat tumors and activate blood circulation. Recent research has found that SRCR induces death in human oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) cells but not in normal cells. SRCR also promotes the production of reactive oxygen species, calcium release, and endoplasmic reticulum stress in OSCC cells, leading to mitochondrial dysfunction and apoptosis. Additionally, SRCR inhibits the migration of OSCC cells by reducing matrix metalloproteinase-12 and -13 expression.
Sparganii Rhizoma and Curcumae Rhizoma (SRCR) are natural herbs used in traditional Chinese medicine to treat tumors and activate blood circulation. Previous studies have shown that SRCR possesses notable antitumor activity; however, the mechanism underlying anticancer activity in human oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) has yet to be fully elucidated. The risk factors of OSCC include smoking, alcohol consumption, poor oral hygiene, and human papillomavirus infection. OSCC is highly metastatic and responds poorly to chemotherapy; thus, alternative treatment options are imperative. In this study, we found that SRCR induced death in OSCC cells but not in normal cells (HGF-1 cells). SRCR has also shown to induce the production of reactive oxygen species in OSCC cells, sequentially promoting calcium release and stress in the endoplasmic reticulum, which resulted in mitochondrial dysfunction and subsequent apoptosis. Furthermore, SRCR has shown to inhibit the migration of OSCC cells by reducing matrix metalloproteinase-12 and -13. Our findings demonstrate that SRCR exerts anticancer activities in OSCC by inducing cell apoptosis and suppressing cell migration.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据