4.4 Article

Probing the Forster Resonance Energy Transfer Dynamics in Colloidal Donor-Acceptor Quantum Dots Assemblies

期刊

JOURNAL OF FLUORESCENCE
卷 -, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

SPRINGER/PLENUM PUBLISHERS
DOI: 10.1007/s10895-023-03301-4

关键词

Quantum dots; CdS; Graphene; Photoluminescence; FRET

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this article, the synthesis of graphene quantum dots (GQDs) and surface modified CdS quantum dots (QDs) is reported. The GQDs and CdS QDs are functionalized and attached via electrostatic interactions, allowing efficient Forster resonance energy transfer (FRET). The understanding of energy transfer in the luminescent donor-acceptor FRET system has important practical implications for improving the efficiency of photovoltaics, sensing, imaging, and optoelectronic devices.
In this article, we report the synthesis of graphene quantum dots (GQDs) by hydrothermal method and surface modified CdS quantum dots (QDs) via the colloidal method and the fabrication of their dyad. The CdS QDs functionalized by mercaptoacetic acid (MAA) attach to the GQDs via electrostatic interactions. Spectral overlapping between the emission spectrum of GQDs and the absorption spectrum of CdS QDs allows efficient Forster resonance energy transfer (FRET) from GQDs to the CdS QDs in the GQDs-CdS QDs dyads. The magnitude of FRET efficiency (E) and the rate of energy transfer (k(E)) assessed by the photoluminescence (PL) decay kinetics are similar to 61.84% and similar to 3.8 x 10(8) s(- 1), respectively. These high values of FRET efficiency and energy transfer rate can be assigned to the existence of strong electrostatic interactions between GQDs and CdS QDs, which arise due to the presence of polar functionalities on the surface of both GQDs and CdS QDs. The understanding of energy transfer in the luminescent donor-acceptor FRET system is of significant importance and the practical implications of such FRET systems could overall improve the efficiency of photovoltaics, sensing, imaging and optoelectronic devices.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据