4.5 Review

Modern three-dimensional digital methods for studying locomotor biomechanics in tetrapods

期刊

JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL BIOLOGY
卷 226, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

COMPANY BIOLOGISTS LTD
DOI: 10.1242/jeb.245132

关键词

Animation; Bone; Dynamics; Gait; Muscle; Optimization

类别

资金

  1. ERC [695517]
  2. Royal Veterinary College
  3. European Research Council (ERC) [695517] Funding Source: European Research Council (ERC)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This article reviews the modern interface of three-dimensional empirical and theoretical approaches to studying the terrestrial locomotion of tetrapod vertebrates using appendages. These methods, ranging from more empirical approaches like motion capture to theoretical approaches like musculoskeletal simulations, have commonalities and synergistic potential when integrated. The article discusses the challenges and pitfalls of these methods and their current and future usage, highlighting their matured state and the new possibilities they offer for answering complex research questions.
Here, we review the modern interface of three-dimensional (3D) empirical (e.g. motion capture) and theoretical (e.g. modelling and simulation) approaches to the study of terrestrial locomotion using appendages in tetrapod vertebrates. These tools span a spectrum from more empirical approaches such as XROMM, to potentially more intermediate approaches such as finite element analysis, to more theoretical approaches such as dynamic musculoskeletal simulations or conceptual models. These methods have much in common beyond the importance of 3D digital technologies, and are powerfully synergistic when integrated, opening a wide range of hypotheses that can be tested. We discuss the pitfalls and challenges of these 3D methods, leading to consideration of the problems and potential in their current and future usage. The tools (hardware and software) and approaches (e.g. methods for using hardware and software) in the 3D analysis of tetrapod locomotion have matured to the point where now we can use this integration to answer questions we could never have tackled 20 years ago, and apply insights gleaned from them to other fields.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据