Patient understanding: How should it be defined and assessed in clinical practice?

In order for patients to make autonomous decisions in a healthcare setting, they must understand relevant information. There is, however, a lack of consensus on how understanding should be defined or assessed in this context, despite the fact that in practice doctors are regularly required to judge whether a patient has understood medical information. Current accounts of patient decision-making often focus on the information which needs to be disclosed to the patient to support their autonomous decision-making. Far less attention has been afforded to questions about how we might determine whether a patient has understood the information disclosed to them. Theoretical approaches to the concept of understanding in this context, and practically useful frameworks for assessing it, are lacking. In this paper, I use a number of hypothetical clinical situations to explore the conditions that are required for a patient to adequately understand information in medical decision-making. Drawing upon the wider philosophical literature, I propose a number of criteria which are necessary for understanding in a medical context: patients must (1) grasp a body of information which (2) reasonably reflects a responsible body of medical professionals' best estimate of the truth, (3) to a degree which meets a context-specific threshold. These criteria may be helpful in guiding assessments of patient understanding in clinical practice.

Automated summary

For patients to make autonomous decisions in healthcare, understanding relevant information is crucial. However, there is a lack of consensus on what constitutes understanding in this context, and little attention has been given to assessing patient comprehension. In this paper, the author explores the conditions necessary for patients to adequately understand medical information and proposes criteria for assessing patient understanding in clinical practice.