4.7 Review

A critical review of adsorption isotherm models for aqueous contaminants: Curve characteristics, site energy distribution and common controversies

期刊

JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
卷 329, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS LTD- ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.117104

关键词

Adsorption; Isotherm model; Site energy distribution; Residual plot; Controversy

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This article summarizes the importance of quantitatively describing the equilibrium data using isotherm models in adsorption studies and highlights the neglect of curve characteristics, selection criteria, and common controversies in previous review papers. The main topics covered in this review include the effect of model parameters on the isotherm curves, determination of site energy distribution, selection criteria for isotherm models, and elimination of common controversies.
The quantitative description of the equilibrium data by the isotherm models is an indispensable link in adsorption studies. The previous review papers focus on the underlying assumptions, fitting methods, error functions and practical applications of the isotherm models, usually ignoring their curve characteristics, selection criteria and common controversies. The main contents of this review include: (i) effect of the model parameters on the isotherm curves; (ii) determination of the site energy distribution; (iii) selection criteria of the isotherm models; and (iv) elimination of some common controversies. It is of great significance to reveal the curve characteristics for selecting a proper isotherm model. The site energy distribution is conducive to understanding the physicochemical properties of the adsorbent surface. The complete isotherm is recommended to be correlated with the experimental data. The model parameter qmax should be cautiously adopted for comparison of the adsorbent performance. The residual plot can be used to diagnose the fitting quality of the isotherm models further. This review also addresses some common mistakes and controversies and thereby avoids their propa-gation in future publications.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据