4.7 Article

Forestry based products as climate change solution: Integrating life cycle assessment with techno-economic analysis

期刊

JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
卷 330, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS LTD- ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.117197

关键词

Techno-economic analysis; Life cycle assessment; Biorefinery; GHG emission; Wood pellet

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study establishes an integrated life cycle analysis and techno-economic assessment to evaluate costs and carbon footprint impacts of an integrated forest biorefinery that produces lumber, industrial sugar and wood pellets in the Pontiac region of Quebec (Canada). The conclusion of this study is that if the GHG emission is considered as the basis of the ranking system, the production of wood pellets would emit the least amount of greenhouse gases, while lumber and sugar production would emit the most. However, if the ranking is based on cost, the sequence would be lumber production, followed by wood pellets and sugar.
This study establishes an integrated life cycle analysis and techno-economic assessment to evaluate costs and carbon footprint impacts of an integrated forest biorefinery that produces lumber, industrial sugar and wood pellets in a planned biomass conversion center in the Pontiac region of Quebec (Canada). An integrated evaluation approach combining levelized cost and carbon footprint accounting was adopted for assessing the implementation of this novel advanced biorefinery concept taking into account different biomass feedstock, diversified product portfolio (sugar, lignin, bio-oil, electricity and lumber) and multiple biomass conversion technologies. The conclusion of this study is that if the GHG emission is considered as the basis of the ranking system, the production of wood pellets would emit less (1.2 kg/T) and that of lumber, and sugar would emit most respectively (3.3 kg/T and 98.4 kg/DT). This is whereas if the ranking would be performed based on the cost, the sequence would be the production of lumber, pellet, and sugar.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据