4.7 Article

Performance evaluation of regulatory schemes for retired electric vehicle battery recycling within dual-recycle channels

期刊

JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
卷 332, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS LTD- ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2023.117354

关键词

Retired batteries; Battery recycling; Regulatory schemes; Stackelberg game; Carbon trading mechanism

向作者/读者索取更多资源

With the rapid development of electric vehicles (EVs), the scrap tide of EV batteries poses a significant challenge to ecological protection. This article investigates a dual-recycle channel closed-loop supply chain and proposes regulatory solutions for retired EV batteries' recycling. Various scenarios are evaluated based on the Stackelberg game and empirical data, and the results provide insights into the recycling performance and its impact on society, economy, and environment. The findings contribute to policy-making and managerial practices for EV battery recycling.
As electric vehicles (EVs) are developing at a rapid pace, the foreseeable scrap tide of EV batteries poses a severe challenge to ecological protection. This article investigates a dual-recycle channel closed-loop supply chain and provides regulatory solutions to retired EV batteries' recycling. Specifically, we construct four supervision scenarios: S1 no policy intervention, S2 reward-penalty scheme, S3 deposit-refund scheme, and S4 dual scheme combining S2 and S3. Based on the Stackelberg game and empirical data, all scenarios' recycling performance is evaluated and compared with a view to society, economy, and environment. The results revealed: (1) Compared with S1, the recycling rate and carbon reduction rate in S2 similar to S4 increase by 2.6049%/0.0092%, 4.0379%/0.0285%, and 6.6660%/0.0379%, respectively; (2) The difference between S2 and S3 in recycling performance depends on regulatory intensities, yet the latter places greater burdens on consumers and firms. The S4 presents optimal environmental performance but at the expense of socioeconomic development; (3) As regulatory intensity increases, social welfare rises driven by environmental benefits, then falls due to overburdened supply chain profits, consumer surplus, and policy expenditures; (4) Carbon trading prices and EVs' potential market sizes affect regulatory schemes' operations. Our results contribute to policy-making and managerial practices for EV battery recycling.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据