4.7 Article

Exploring socio-economic externalities of development scenarios. An analysis of EU regions from 2008 to 2016

期刊

JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
卷 332, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS LTD- ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2023.117327

关键词

Socio-economic externalities; Sustainable development scenarios; Unconditional growth modelling; Industrial carbon emissions; Green growth; Degrowth

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper utilizes an unconditional growth model to analyze a unique dataset of European regions from 2008 to 2016 and identifies four development scenarios: green growth, green de-growth, black growth, and black de-growth, each characterized by different relationships between CO2 emissions and economic growth. The authors then map European regions onto these scenarios and describe the variations in socio-economic externalities, such as competences, investments, and well-being. Their analysis contributes to the debate on development scenarios and ecological macro-economics, and provides implications for sustainability policy and research.
A great debate around development scenarios has come to define conversations around the economy and the environment, two dimensions that struggle to find a proper balance. In this paper we apply unconditional growth model analyses to a new and unique dataset of European regions between 2008 and 2016 and identify four development scenarios - green growth, green de-growth, black growth and black de-growth - characterized by different relationships between CO2 emissions and economic growth. We then map European regions across these four scenarios and describe the differences that occurred among regions in terms of socio-economic externalities, mainly competences, investments and well-being. Drawing on our analyses, we contribute to the debate on development scenarios and ecological macro-economics, as well as discuss implications for sustainability policy and research.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据