4.4 Article

Reliability Analysis of Structures by Active Learning Enhanced Sparse Bayesian Regression

期刊

JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING MECHANICS
卷 149, 期 5, 页码 -

出版社

ASCE-AMER SOC CIVIL ENGINEERS
DOI: 10.1061/JENMDT.EMENG-6964

关键词

Structural reliability; Sparse Bayesian regression; Active learning; Error-based stopping criterion; Adaptive sparse Bayesian regression-Monte Carlo simulation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Adaptive sampling near a limit state is crucial for reliability analysis of structures using metamodels. Active learning based on posterior mean and standard deviation provided by a chosen metamodel is widely used for such adaptive sampling. In this study, active learning-enhanced adaptive sampling-based sparse Bayesian regression is explored for reliability analysis.
Adaptive sampling near a limit state is important for metamodeling-based reliability analysis of structures involving an implicit limit state function. Active learning based on the posterior mean and standard deviation provided by a chosen metamodel is widely used for such adaptive sampling. Most studies on active learning-based reliability estimation methods use the Kriging approach, which provides prediction along with its variance. As with the Kriging approach, sparse Bayesian learning-based regression also provides posterior mean and standard deviation. Due to the sparsity involved in learning, it is expected to be computationally faster than the Kriging approach. Motivated by this, active learning-enhanced adaptive sampling-based sparse Bayesian regression is explored in the present study for reliability analysis. In doing so, polynomial basis functions, which do not involve free parameters, are chosen for the sparse Bayesian regression to avoid computationally expensive parameter tuning. The convergence of the proposed approach is attained based on the stabilization of 10 consecutive failure estimates. The effectiveness of the proposed adaptive sparse Bayesian regression approach is illustrated numerically with five examples.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据