Quantifying the effect of experimental design choices for in vitro scratch assays

Scratch assays are often used to investigate potential drug treatments for chronic wounds and cancer. Interpreting these experiments with a mathematical model allows us to estimate the cell diffusivity, D, and the cell proliferation rate, lambda. However, the influence of the experimental design on the estimates of D and lambda is unclear. Here we apply an approximate Bayesian computation (ABC) parameter inference method, which produces a posterior distribution of D and lambda, to new sets of synthetic data, generated from an idealised mathematical model, and experimental data for a non-adhesive mesenchymal population of fibroblast cells. The posterior distribution allows us to quantify the amount of information obtained about D and lambda. We investigate two types of scratch assay; as well as varying the number and timing of the experimental observations captured. Our results show that a scrape assay, involving one cell front, provides more precise estimates of D and lambda, and is more computationally efficient to interpret than a wound assay, with two opposingly directed cell fronts. We find that recording two observations, after making the initial observation, is sufficient to estimate D and lambda, and that the final observation time should correspond to the time taken for the cell front to move across the field of view. These results provide guidance for estimating D and lambda, while simultaneously minimising the time and cost associated with performing and interpreting the experiment. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.