4.6 Article

Field-based recombinase polymerase amplification and lab-based qPCR assays for detection of Helicoverpa armigera

期刊

JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC ENTOMOLOGY
卷 116, 期 3, 页码 973-982

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS INC
DOI: 10.1093/jee/toad048

关键词

Old World bollworm; Helicoverpa zea; RPA; qPCR

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study developed a field-based recombinase polymerase amplification (RPA) assay combined with a lateral flow strip and qPCR melt curve assay to specifically detect Helicoverpa armigera DNA in pooled moth samples. These newly developed molecular assays will contribute to large-scale surveillance programs of H. armigera.
Helicoverpa armigera (Hubner) is a major crop pest native to Europe, Asia, Australia, and Africa which has recently invaded South America and has caused billions of dollars in agricultural losses. Because of challenges in differentiating between H. armigera and Helicoverpa zea (Boddie), a closely related species native to North and South America, genetic tests have previously been developed to detect H. armigera DNA in pooled samples of moth legs. In this study, a field-based recombinase polymerase amplification (RPA) assay using a lateral flow strip and a qPCR melt curve assay were developed for specific detection of H. armigera DNA in pooled moth samples. In addition, a crude DNA extraction protocol for whole moths was developed to allow rapid preparation of DNA samples. The RPA field test was able to detect >= 10 pg of purified H. armigera DNA and the crude DNA of one H. armigera sample in a background of 999 H. zea equivalents. The qPCR assay was able to detect >= 100 fg of purified H. armigera DNA and the crude DNA of one H. armigera sample in a background of up to 99,999 H. zea equivalents. Both RPA and qPCR assays detected H. armigera in the crude DNA extracted in the field from a pool of one H. armigera moth and 999 H. zea moths. These newly developed molecular assays to detect H. armigera will contribute to large-scale surveillance programs of H. armigera.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据