4.3 Article

Adipose-derived stem cell exosomes for treatment of dupilumab-related facial redness in patients with atopic dermatitis

期刊

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/09546634.2023.2220444

关键词

Atopic dermatitis; dupilumab; dupilumab facial redness; exosome; filaggrin; inflammation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study evaluated the efficacy and safety of a topical formulation containing human adipose tissue-derived mesenchymal stem cell-derived exosomes (ASCEs) in the treatment of DFR. The results showed that ASCEs can alleviate DFR by downregulating local inflammation and restoring skin barrier function.
Background Dupilumab facial redness (DFR) is a side effect of dupilumab treatment that has only been recently reported. We previously reported on two patients with DFR who were successfully treated with a topical formulation containing human adipose tissue-derived mesenchymal stem cell-derived exosomes (ASCEs). Objectives The study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of ASCEs in DFR. Participants and methods We performed 12-week prospective study at single center. Twenty adult atopic dermatitis patients diagnosed with DFR were enrolled. They were treated with a topical application of the exosome formulation every week for five consecutive weeks. Results After exosome treatment, both the average investigator global assessment score and clinical erythema assessment scale scores decreased. 19 patients (95%) were satisfied with the treatment. Compared to baseline, erythema index at week 4 were decreased by 31, 27, 13, and 25 units on the forehead, chin, right and left cheek respectively. The analysis of stratum corneum samples revealed the expression of IL-1 alpha and human thymic stromal lymphopoietin was suppressed after exosome treatment, whereas filaggrin and vascular endothelial growth factor expression increased. Conclusions This study suggests topical formulation containing ASCEs can alleviate DFR by downregulating local inflammation and restoring skin barrier function.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据