4.7 Article

Autophagy Plays a Crucial Role in Ameloblast Differentiation

期刊

JOURNAL OF DENTAL RESEARCH
卷 102, 期 9, 页码 1047-1057

出版社

SAGE PUBLICATIONS INC
DOI: 10.1177/00220345231169220

关键词

Atg7; Atg3; tooth development; ameloblasts; enamel formation; amelogenesis imperfecta

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Tooth enamel is generated by ameloblasts. Failure in amelogenesis leads to enamel defects known as amelogenesis imperfecta. This study showed that mice with deficient autophagy in epithelial-derived tissues exhibited amelogenesis imperfecta, with reduced enamel density and thickness. Autophagy plays a crucial role in ameloblast differentiation and its failure results in amelogenesis imperfecta through ectopic NRF2 activation.
Tooth enamel is generated by ameloblasts. Any failure in amelogenesis results in defects in the enamel, a condition known as amelogenesis imperfecta. Here, we report that mice with deficient autophagy in epithelial-derived tissues (K14-Cre;Atg7(F/F) and K14-Cre;Atg3(F/F) conditional knockout mice) exhibit amelogenesis imperfecta. Micro-computed tomography imaging confirmed that enamel density and thickness were significantly reduced in the teeth of these mice. At the molecular level, ameloblast differentiation was compromised through ectopic accumulation and activation of NRF2, a specific substrate of autophagy. Through bioinformatic analyses, we identified Bcl11b, Dlx3, Klk4, Ltbp3, Nectin1, and Pax9 as candidate genes related to amelogenesis imperfecta and the NRF2-mediated pathway. To investigate the effects of the ectopic NRF2 pathway activation caused by the autophagy deficiency, we analyzed target gene expression and NRF2 binding to the promoter region of candidate target genes and found suppressed gene expression of Bcl11b, Dlx3, Klk4, and Nectin1 but not of Ltbp3 and Pax9. Taken together, our findings indicate that autophagy plays a crucial role in ameloblast differentiation and that its failure results in amelogenesis imperfecta through ectopic NRF2 activation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据