4.7 Article

Understanding the phenotypic and genetic background of the lactose content in Sarda dairy sheep

期刊

JOURNAL OF DAIRY SCIENCE
卷 106, 期 5, 页码 3312-3320

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.3168/jds.2022-22579

关键词

ewes; milk traits; lactose heritability; genome-wide association study

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study investigated the factors affecting lactose content in sheep milk and found that it is influenced by several factors, suggesting the possibility of incorporating lactose content into breeding programs.
Lactose, the principal carbohydrate found in milk, plays an important role in the physiological processes of milk production because it is related to milk volume, and it is responsible for the osmotic equilibrium between blood and milk in the mammary gland. In this study, factors affecting lactose content (LC) in sheep milk are investigated. For this purpose, 2,358 test-day records were sampled from 509 ewes (3-7 records per animal). The LC and other main milk traits were analyzed using a mixed linear model that included days in milk (DIM) class, parity, lambing month, and type of lambing as fixed effects and animal, permanent environment, and flock test day as random effects. The pedigree-based approach was used to estimate the heritability and re-peatability of LC. Moreover, the genomic background of LC was investigated through a GWAS. The LC was affected by all tested factors (i.e., DIM class, parity, lambing month, and type of lambing). Low heritability (0.10 +/- 0.05) and moderate repeatability (0.42 +/- 0.02) were estimated for LC. High negative genetic correla-tions were estimated between LC and NaCl (-0.99 +/- 0.01) and between LC and somatic cell count (-0.94 +/- 0.05). Only 2 markers passed the chromosome-wide Bonferroni threshold. Results of the present study, al-though obtained on a relatively small sample, suggest the possibility to include LC in the breeding programs, particularly because of its strong relationship with NaCl and somatic cell count.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据