4.7 Review

Graduate Student Literature Review: Mitochondrial response to heat stress and its implications on dairy cattle bioenergetics, metabolism, and production*

期刊

JOURNAL OF DAIRY SCIENCE
卷 106, 期 10, 页码 7295-7309

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.3168/jds.2023-23340

关键词

hyperthermia; livestock; oxidative stress; energy metabolism

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Heat stress negatively affects milk production and increases disease risk in dairy cows. It alters metabolic adaptations, such as nutrient mobilization and partitioning, compromising the energy demands of lactation. Mitochondrial density and bioenergetic capacity at the cellular level play a role in meeting the changing energy requirements in response to heat stress.
The dairy industry depends upon the cow's successful lactation for economic profitability. Heat stress compromises the economic sustainability of the dairy industry by reducing milk production and increasing the risk of metabolic and pathogenic disease. Heat stress alters metabolic adaptations, such as nutrient mobilization and partitioning, that support the energetic demands of lactation. Metabolically inflexible cows are unable to enlist the necessary homeorhetic shifts that provide the needed nutrients and energy for milk synthesis, thereby vide the energetic foundation that enable a myriad of metabolically demanding processes, such as lactation. Changes in an animal's energy requirements are met at the cellular level through alterations in mitochondrial density and bioenergetic capacity. Mitochondria also energetic responses to stress by integrating endocrine signals, through mito-nuclear communication, into the cellular stress response. In vitro heat insults affect mitochondria through a compromise in mitochondrial integrity, which is linked to a decrease in mitochondrial function. However, limited evidence exists linking the animals. This review summarizes the literature describwith a focus on the effect of heat stress on mitochonhealth are also discussed.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据