4.4 Article

Electron mobility in GaN layers and HEMT structure optimized by MOVPE technological parameters

期刊

JOURNAL OF CRYSTAL GROWTH
卷 605, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcrysgro.2022.127061

关键词

A1; HEMT; GaN; A3; Metalorganic vapor phase epitaxy

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Although various aspects of GaN high electron mobility transistor (HEMT) structure have been extensively studied, such as buffer layer architecture, AlGaN barrier, surface passivation, and dielectric choice, little attention has been given to optimize the GaN channel technology. In this work, we demonstrate that by optimizing the channel technology, electron mobility can be significantly improved. We investigated the influence of technological parameters on the transport properties of a series of GaN layers mimicking a HEMT channel. We focused on the layer growth using TEG precursor and examined parameters such as reactor atmosphere, growth temperature, growth rate influenced by precursor concentration, and reactor pressure. By using optimized growth parameters for the HEMT structure, we successfully increased the electron mobility in 2DEG by 30%.
Although a lot of attention was devoted to different aspects of GaN high electron mobility transistor (HEMT) structure such as buffer layer architecture, AlGaN barrier, surface passivation and dielectric choice, not much attention was paid to optimize the technology of GaN channel. We show in this work that by optimizing the channel technology the electron mobility can be significantly improved. We have studied the influence of technological parameters on transport properties on the series of GaN layers resembling a HEMT channel. We pay most attention to the layer growth using TEG precursor. The examined parameters were type of reactor atmosphere, growth temperature, growth rate influenced by precursor concentration and reactor pressure. Using optimized parameters for growth of a HEMT structure, we have succeeded in increasing the electron mobility in 2DEG by 30 %.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据