4.0 Article

Striae gravidarum treatment: evaluating non-ablating fractional laser (NAFL) efficacy and safety

期刊

JOURNAL OF COSMETIC AND LASER THERAPY
卷 25, 期 1-4, 页码 20-24

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS INC
DOI: 10.1080/14764172.2023.2221837

关键词

Striea distensae; pregnancy; starlux; striae gravidarum; laser; 1540 nm non-ablative fractional laser

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study evaluated the safety and efficacy of 1540 nm non-ablative fractional laser treatment in Iranian women with striae gravidarum (SG). The results showed that treatment with this laser may be considered a safe and partially effective option for SG patients, with minimal side effects.
BackgroundStriae gravidarum (SG) is a common pregnancy-related dermatologic problem, for which finding an effective treatment remains a challenge.AimTo evaluate the safety and efficacy of 1540 nm non-ablative fractional laser (Star lux 500) in the treatment of SG in Iranian women and peruse the relationship between clinical improvement rate and patient characteristics as well as clinical features of striae.MethodA prospective before-after study was conducted on 50 patients with SG who received three monthly sessions of 1540 nm non-ablative fractional laser and were followed for 2 months after the last treatment session. Clinical changes were measured using both provider-rated outcome through before/after pictures represented by final clinical score (from 0 to 5) and patient-reported outcome (patient global assessment or PGA).ResultsOver the course of the study both final clinical score and PGA increased significantly from week 4 to week 20 (P value: <0.001 and 0.048, respectively). Only modest adverse effects including erythema, edema and hyperpigmentation were noted.ConclusionIn conclusion, patients with SG of different type (rubra/alba) or maturity may somehow benefit from treatment with NAFL experiencing minimal transient side effects.Therefore, NAFL may be considered a safe and partially effective treatment option for stretch mark of patients with SG.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.0
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据