4.5 Article

Seismic behavior of novel modular structural joint with grouted channel connection

期刊

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcsr.2023.107891

关键词

Modular steel building; Grouted channel steel connection; Cyclic tests; Seismic properties

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study proposes an innovative joint with grouted channel steel connection for modular steel buildings (MSB), which satisfies decoration requirements and allows for installation tolerances. Quasi-static testing of T-shaped joints was conducted, evaluating seismic properties such as stiffness, bearing capacity, ductility, and energy dissipation capacity. Results showed that axial force ratio had little effect on seismic properties, while the addition of stiffeners increased bearing capacity by 12.6%. The study also provided calculation and design methods for grouted connections, laying the foundation for their use in MSB.
This study proposes an innovative joint with grouted channel steel connection that can satisfy the complete decoration requirements of modular steel buildings (MSB) and adequate allowable installation tolerances to accommodate imperfections. Quasi-static testing of four full-size T-shaped joints was carried out, and the seismic properties of the grouted joints were evaluated in detail through initial stiffness, bearing capacity, ductility and energy dissipation capacity. The results show that the axial force ratio has little effect on the seismic properties of the joints; the bearing capacity of the joints with stiffener is increased by 12.6%. The stiffness and bearing ca-pacity of the joints are analyzed. Both beams can achieve full-section yielding, and the joint can meet the re-quirements of full-strength joints. Finally, through theoretical analysis and numerical simulation, the bearing capacity calculation method of grouted connection is obtained, and the corresponding design methods and suggestions are given, which provide the basis for the use of grouted connections in MSB.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据