4.7 Article

A metalearning approach for Physics-Informed Neural Networks (PINNs): Application to parameterized PDEs

期刊

JOURNAL OF COMPUTATIONAL PHYSICS
卷 477, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcp.2023.111912

关键词

Parameterized PDEs; Metalearning; Surrogate modeling

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Physics-informed neural networks (PINNs) are gaining attention for discretizing partial differential equations (PDEs) in Computational Science and Engineering (CS&E). PINNs face challenges in terms of accuracy, convergence, optimization strategies, and computational cost. This paper introduces metalearning concepts to speed up PINNs optimization and tests the approach on various parameterized PDEs.
Physics-informed neural networks (PINNs) as a means of discretizing partial differential equations (PDEs) are garnering much attention in the Computational Science and Engi-neering (CS&E) world. At least two challenges exist for PINNs at present: an understanding of accuracy and convergence characteristics with respect to tunable parameters and iden-tification of optimization strategies that make PINNs as efficient as other computational science tools. The cost of PINNs training remains a major challenge of Physics-informed Machine Learning (PiML) - and, in fact, machine learning (ML) in general. This paper is meant to move towards addressing the latter through the study of PINNs on new tasks, for which parameterized PDEs provides a good testbed application as tasks can be eas-ily defined in this context. Following the ML world, we introduce metalearning of PINNs with application to parameterized PDEs. By introducing metalearning and transfer learning concepts, we can greatly accelerate the PINNs optimization process. We present a survey of model-agnostic metalearning, and then discuss our model-aware metalearning applied to PINNs as well as implementation considerations and algorithmic complexity. We then test our approach on various canonical forward parameterized PDEs that have been presented in the emerging PINNs literature. (c) 2023 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据