4.5 Article

A Generalization Gap Estimation for Overparameterized Models via the Langevin Functional Variance

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS INC
DOI: 10.1080/10618600.2023.2197488

关键词

Bayesian inference; Langevin dynamics; Neural networks; Overparameterization

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This article discusses the estimation of the generalization gap for overparameterized models, including neural networks. It shows that the functional variance characterizes the generalization gap even in overparameterized settings. To overcome the computational cost, the Langevin approximation of the functional variance (Langevin FV) is proposed, which only relies on the first-order gradient of the squared loss function. The method is demonstrated numerically on overparameterized linear regression and nonlinear neural network models.
This article discusses the estimation of the generalization gap, the difference between generalization performance and training performance, for overparameterized models including neural networks. We first show that a functional variance, a key concept in defining a widely-applicable information criterion, characterizes the generalization gap even in overparameterized settings where a conventional theory cannot be applied. As the computational cost of the functional variance is expensive for the overparameterized models, we propose an efficient approximation of the function variance, the Langevin approximation of the functional variance (Langevin FV). This method leverages only the first-order gradient of the squared loss function, without referencing the second-order gradient; this ensures that the computation is efficient and the implementation is consistent with gradient-based optimization algorithms. We demonstrate the Langevin FV numerically by estimating the generalization gaps of overparameterized linear regression and nonlinear neural network models, containing more than a thousand of parameters therein. for this article are available online.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据