4.7 Article

Cubic spline interpolation with optimal end conditions

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.cam.2022.115039

关键词

Cubic spline interpolation; End conditions; Not-a-knot end condition; Interpolation error estimation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Traditional end conditions for cubic spline interpolation involve values and derivatives of interpolated functions at boundary knots. The not-a-knot end condition proposed by de Boor (1985) is a practical approach that doesn't require derivatives at the end knots. However, it suffers from a significant disadvantage of reduced accuracy at boundary intervals. In this paper, we propose an optimal arrangement of shifted spline knots that improves the interpolation accuracy by approximately 3.4 times compared to de Boor's not-a-knot end condition. We also present optimal end conditions for approximating the first and second derivatives. Representative examples demonstrate the effectiveness and superiority of the proposed method.
Traditional end conditions for cubic spline interpolation consist of values, the first or the second derivatives of interpolated functions on the boundary interpolation knots. The not-a-knot end condition proposed by de Boor (1985) is a kind of end condition of cubic spline interpolation for the practical application without the requirements of the derivatives at the end knots. However, a significant disadvantage of such end condition is that there is a sharp decrease in the accuracy of the interpolation at boundary intervals. In this paper, by changing the locations of two spline knots in not-a-knot end condition, we propose the optimal arrangement of shifted spline knots for cubic spline interpolation. The proposed scheme leads to an approximately 3.4 times increasing in the accuracy of the interpolation compared to the de Boor's not -a-knot end condition. Furthermore, we also present the optimal end conditions of cubic spline interpolation to approximate the first and the second derivatives of interpolated functions. The representative examples show the effectiveness and the superiority of the proposed method. (c) 2022 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据