4.7 Article

Core/shell (ZnO/polyacrylamide) nanocomposite: In-situ emulsion polymerization, corrosion inhibition, anti-microbial and anti-biofilm characteristics

期刊

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jtice.2016.03.037

关键词

Core/shell nanocomposites; Zinc oxide nanoparticles; Polyacrylamide nanoparticles; In-situ emulsion polymerization; Corrosion inhibition; Antimicrobial and antibiofilm activity

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Polyacrylamide nanoparticles of 20 nm were prepared using emulsion polymerization technique. Core/shell nanocomposites of functional core of zinc oxide nanoparticles surrounded by a shell of polyacrylamide were also prepared using in-situ emulsion polymerization technique. Potentiodynamic polarization and Electrochemical impedance parameters for corrosion of carbon steel in absence and presence of ZnO/PAM.NCs indicated that, as the ZnO nanoparticles ratio increased, the corrosion inhibition efficiency increased; 50%, 80% and 94% for 1, 5 and 10% ZnO; respectively. Scanning electron micrographs of carbon steel specimen surface immersed in HCl in absence and presence of ZnO/PAM.NC10 indicated that carbon steel surface is less damaged in presence of ZnO/PAM.NC10 which confirms the observed high inhibition efficiency. ZnO/PAM.NC10 was found to display a broad spectrum antimicrobial activity with the inhibition zones in the range of 15-22 mm. ZnO/PAM.NC10 demonstrated a higher antibacterial activity for the Gram-positive than for the Gram-negative bacteria and exhibited lower minimum inhibitory concentrations and minimum bactericidal concentrations for the Gram negative bacteria than the Gram positive bacteria. Moreover, it showed MICs/MFCs against yeast and fungal strains at concentrations (250/250 ppm). Additionally, ZnO/PAM.NC10 exhibited antibiofilms activity against the standard bacterial strains; Bacillus subtilis and Escherichia coli as confirmed by SEM imaging. (C) 2016 Taiwan Institute of Chemical Engineers. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据