相关参考文献
注意：仅列出部分参考文献，下载原文获取全部文献信息。CHARMS and PROBAST at your fingertips: a template for data extraction and risk of bias assessment in systematic reviews of predictive models
Borja M. Fernandez-Felix et al.
BMC MEDICAL RESEARCH METHODOLOGY (2023)
Meta-research studies should improve and evaluate their own data sharing practices
Ioana A. Cristea et al.
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY (2022)
Machine learning computational tools to assist the performance of systematic reviews: A mapping review
Ramon Cierco Jimenez et al.
BMC MEDICAL RESEARCH METHODOLOGY (2022)
Reporting of methods to prepare, pilot and perform data extraction in systematic reviews: analysis of a sample of 152 Cochrane and non-Cochrane reviews
Roland Brian Buechter et al.
BMC MEDICAL RESEARCH METHODOLOGY (2021)
Systematic review automation tools improve efficiency but lack of knowledge impedes their adoption: a survey
Anna Mae Scott et al.
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY (2021)
Resource use during systematic review production varies widely: a scoping review
B. Nussbaumer-Streit et al.
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY (2021)
Adjudication rather than experience of data abstraction matters more in reducing errors in abstracting data in systematic reviews
Jian-Yu E et al.
RESEARCH SYNTHESIS METHODS (2020)
Development, testing and use of data extraction forms in systematic reviews: a review of methodological guidance
Roland Brian Buechter et al.
BMC MEDICAL RESEARCH METHODOLOGY (2020)
Few studies exist examining methods for selecting studies, abstracting data, and appraising quality in a systematic review
Reid C. Robson et al.
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY (2019)
A guide to systematic review and meta-analysis of prognostic factor studies
Richard D. Riley et al.
BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL (2019)
Definition of a systematic review used in overviews of systematic reviews, meta-epidemiological studies and textbooks
Marina Krnic Martinic et al.
BMC MEDICAL RESEARCH METHODOLOGY (2019)
A randomized trial provided new evidence on the accuracy and efficiency of traditional vs. electronically annotated abstraction approaches in systematic reviews
Tianjing Li et al.
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY (2019)
Contacting of authors modified crucial outcomes of systematic reviews but was poorly reported, not systematic, and produced conflicting results
Reint Meursinge Reynders et al.
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY (2019)
The use of clinical study reports to enhance the quality of systematic reviews: a survey of systematic review authors
Alex Hodkinson et al.
SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS (2018)
Frequency of data extraction errors and methods to increase data extraction quality: a methodological review
Tim Mathes et al.
BMC MEDICAL RESEARCH METHODOLOGY (2017)
The Mass Production of Redundant, Misleading, and Conflicted Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses
John P. A. Ioannidis
MILBANK QUARTERLY (2016)
How do authors of systematic reviews deal with research malpractice and misconduct in original studies? A cross-sectional analysis of systematic reviews and survey of their authors
Nadia Elia et al.
BMJ OPEN (2016)
When and how to update systematic reviews: consensus and checklist
Paul Garner et al.
BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL (2016)
When and how to update systematic reviews: consensus and checklist
Paul Garner et al.
BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL (2016)
What's in a name? The challenge of describing interventions in systematic reviews: analysis of a random sample of reviews of non-pharmacological stroke interventions
Tammy C. Hoffmann et al.
BMJ OPEN (2015)
Systematic reviewers commonly contact study authors but do so with limited rigor
Rebecca J. Mullan et al.
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY (2009)
The qualitative content analysis process
Satu Elo et al.
JOURNAL OF ADVANCED NURSING (2008)
分享论文
