4.7 Article

The global warming potential and the material utility of PET and bio-based PEF bottles over multiple recycling trips

期刊

JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION
卷 395, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.136426

关键词

Plastics; Circular economy; Bioeconomy; Climate change; Waste treatment; Netherlands

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Biomass use and recycling can help reduce greenhouse gas emissions in the plastics industry. Polyethylene furanoate (PEF), a bio-based plastic, shows promise as an alternative to polyethylene terephthalate (PET) for small bottle applications. Life cycle assessments were conducted in the Netherlands, comparing the global warming potential (GWP) of PET and PEF bottles through multiple mechanical and chemical recycling trips. Results showed that after one recycling trip, bio-based PEF had 50-74% lower GWP compared to PET, depending on the waste management scenario. The study also highlighted the importance of deposit-based recycling systems in reducing overall GHG emissions for both bottle types.
Biomass use and recycling are among the few options to reduce the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions of the growing plastics sector. The bio-based plastic polyethylene furanoate (PEF) is a promising alternative to poly-ethylene terephthalate (PET), in particular for small bottle applications. For the first time, we assessed the life cycle global warming potential (GWP) for 250 mL PET and PEF bottles over multiple mechanical (MR) and chemical (CR) recycling trips in the Netherlands. We found that bio-based PEF would offer 50-74% lower life cycle GHG emission after one recycling trip compared to PET, depending on the waste management case. Our results also show that deposit-based recycling systems significantly reduce the cumulative cradle-to-grave net GHG emissions for both bottle types, especially when multiple recycling trips are applied. We propose com-plementary material utility (MU) indicators to reveal synergies and trade-offs between circularity and GWP: While deposit-based CR shows the best performance in terms of MU, it falls behind deposit-based MR when it comes to net GHG emissions due to the energy intensity of CR. Hence, combining mechanical and chemical recycling could contribute to achieving the goals of the circular economy and climate change mitigation alike.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据