4.7 Article

Sustainable construction project of electric vehicle charging stations: A risk-based hybrid decision-making approach

期刊

JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION
卷 402, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.136565

关键词

Electric vehicles charging stations; Decision-making; Risk assessment; R-numbers; Sustainable transportation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The sustainable evaluation of energy sources for EV charging stations is crucial. We propose a model based on R-numbers and combined compromise solution method (R-COCOSO) to assess the sustainability of these stations. We also developed the CODAS method based on R-numbers to evaluate project risk, and a linear programming model to optimize workload allocation and contractors' risk response based on R-numbers and the epsilon-constraint approach. A real case in Tehran, Iran, was used to validate the accuracy of the model.
Nowadays, a serious environmental challenge is the pollution emitted by combustion engine vehicles. Govern-ments have found that replacing these with electric vehicles (EVs) is a viable solution for sustainable trans-portation. The sustainable operation of fast charging stations for EVs is a critical parameter in these vehicles' popularity. Herein, a propose a model for the sustainable evaluation of energy sources of charging stations based on the R-numbers and combined compromise solution method (R-COCOSO). The construction of EV charging stations is done based on new and developing technologies, and they are often expensive, complex, and high-risk. Thus, we developed the combinative distance-based assessment (CODAS) method based on R-numbers to assess the project risk. Moreover, a linear programming model was developed to assess the contractors' risk response and the optimal allocation of their workload based on R-numbers and the epsilon-constraint approach. A real case of building charging stations in Tehran, Iran, was presented to test the accuracy of the model.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据