4.5 Article

Isothermal vapor-liquid equilibrium for (fluoroethane+1,1-difluoroethane) binary system and (difluoromethane plus fluoroethane+1,1-difluoroethane) ternary system at temperatures from 263.15 K to 303.15 K

期刊

JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL THERMODYNAMICS
卷 179, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS LTD- ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jct.2022.106982

关键词

R161; R152a; R32; Vapor -Liquid Phase Equilibrium

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this study, vapor-liquid equilibrium properties were measured for fluoroethane (R161) + 1,1-difluoroethane (R152a) binary system and difluoromethane (R32) + R161 + R152a ternary system using a static analytical apparatus. The measured data were regressed using PR-vdW and PR-NRTL-MHV2 models, with a pressure-based objective function used for correlation. The maximum average absolute relative deviation in pressure calculated by the models were 0.75% for R161 + R152a and 0.77% for R32 + R161 + R152a using PR-vdW model, and 0.68% for R161 + R152a and 0.62% for R32 + R161 + R152a using PR-NRTL-MHV2 model. No azeotropic behavior was observed in the binary and ternary systems.
In this paper, the vapor-liquid equilibrium property were measured using a static analytical apparatus for the fluoroethane (R161) + 1,1-difluoroethane (R152a) binary system and difluoromethane (R32) + R161 + R152a ternary system. A total of 21 data points for R161 + R152a and 30 data points for R32 + R161 + R152a were obtained over the temperature range from 263.15 to 303.15 K. The data were regressed by the PR-vdW and PR-NRTL-MHV2 models. A pressure based objective function was used to correlate the VLE data at each tempera-ture. The maximum average absolute relative deviation in pressure calculated by the PR-vdW model are 0.75 % for R161 + R152a and 0.77 % for R32 + R161 + R152a, while those of the PR-NRTL-MHV2 model are 0.68 % for R161 + R152a and 0.62 % for R32 + R161 + R152a. No azeotropic behaviour can be observed for the binary and ternary system.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据