4.7 Article

Non-perturbative many-body treatment of molecular magnets

期刊

JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL PHYSICS
卷 158, 期 23, 页码 -

出版社

AIP Publishing
DOI: 10.1063/5.0150706

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Molecular magnets have great potential in quantum information and computing, but their accurate computational treatment is challenging due to the competition among different effects. Electron correlation and spin-orbit coupling play central roles, and the large size of molecular magnets adds to the complexity. The use of auxiliary-field quantum Monte Carlo allows for an ab initio treatment that accurately includes electron correlation, spin-orbit coupling, and material specificity.
Molecular magnets have received significant attention because of their potential applications in quantum information and quantum computing. A delicate balance of electron correlation, spin-orbit coupling (SOC), ligand field splitting, and other effects produces a persistent magnetic moment within each molecular magnet unit. The discovery and design of molecular magnets with improved functionalities would be greatly aided by accurate computations. However, the competition among the different effects poses a challenge for theoretical treatments. Electron correlation plays a central role since d- or f-element ions, which provide the magnetic states in molecular magnets, often require explicit many-body treatments. SOC, which expands the dimensionality of the Hilbert space, can also lead to non-perturbative effects in the presence of strong interaction. Furthermore, molecular magnets are large, with tens of atoms in even the smallest systems. We show how an ab initio treatment of molecular magnets can be achieved with auxiliary-field quantum Monte Carlo, in which electron correlation, SOC, and material specificity are included accurately and on an equal footing. The approach is demonstrated by an application to compute the zero-field splitting of a locally linear Co2+ complex.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据