4.7 Article

Slater transition methods for core-level electron binding energies

期刊

JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL PHYSICS
卷 158, 期 9, 页码 -

出版社

AIP Publishing
DOI: 10.1063/5.0134459

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The methods for computing core-level ionization energies are evaluated and compared. The full core hole approach and Slater's transition concept are considered, with the latter showing mean errors of 0.3-0.4 eV compared to experiment. A shifted Slater transition method requiring only initial-state Kohn-Sham eigenvalues is found to be a simple and practical way to compute core-level binding energies. It is particularly useful for simulating transient x-ray experiments.
Methods for computing core-level ionization energies using self-consistent field (SCF) calculations are evaluated and benchmarked. These include a full core hole (or delta SCF) approach that fully accounts for orbital relaxation upon ionization, but also methods based on Slater's transition concept in which the binding energy is estimated from an orbital energy level that is obtained from a fractional-occupancy SCF calculation. A generalization that uses two different fractional-occupancy SCF calculations is also considered. The best of the Slater-type methods afford mean errors of 0.3-0.4 eV with respect to experiment for a dataset of K-shell ionization energies, a level of accuracy that is competitive with more expensive many-body techniques. An empirical shifting procedure with one adjustable parameter reduces the average error below 0.2 eV. This shifted Slater transition method is a simple and practical way to compute core-level binding energies using only initial-state Kohn-Sham eigenvalues. It requires no more computational effort than ASCF and may be especially useful for simulating transient x-ray experiments where core-level spectroscopy is used to probe an excited electronic state, for which the ASCF approach requires a tedious state-by-state calculation of the spectrum. As an example, we use Slater-type methods to model x-ray emission spectroscopy.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据