4.8 Article

Potassium as the best alkali metal promoter in boosting the hydrogenation activity of Ru/MgO for aromatic LOHC molecules by facilitated heterolytic H2 adsorption

期刊

JOURNAL OF CATALYSIS
卷 419, 期 -, 页码 112-124

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcat.2023.02.006

关键词

Liquid organic hydrogen carrier; Hydrogenation; Supported Ru catalysts; Heterolytic H 2 adsorption; Alkali metals

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Alkali metals (AM) are commonly used as promoters in various reactions, and in the hydrogenation of aromatic compounds over Ru/MgO catalysts, their basicity can promote heterolytic H2 adsorption, enhancing reaction kinetics. Ru/AM/MgO catalysts (AM: Na, K, and Cs) with different AM/Ru molar ratios were prepared and evaluated, showing a volcano-type relationship between activity and AM/Ru molar ratio. The best promoter among the AMs was found to be K+, followed by Na+ and Cs+, attributed to heterolytic H2 adsorption induced by charge transfer from AM to proximate Ru atoms at the Ru-MgO interface.
Alkali metals (AM) are frequently used as promoters in a number of reactions. In aromatic hydrogenation over Ru/MgO, their basicity may promote heterolytic H2 adsorption, thereby boosting reaction kinetics. Herein, Ru/AM/MgO catalysts (AM: Na, K, and Cs) with different AM/Ru molar ratios are prepared and evaluated in the hydrogenation of toluene and benzyltoluene. The activity exhibits a volcano-type relationship with the AM/Ru molar ratio, where the optimal AM content decreases in the order Na+ > K+ > Cs+ and the AM showing the best activity is in the sequence Cs+ < Na+ < K+. These results originate from the heterolytic H2 adsorption induced by charge transfer from AM to proximate Ru atoms at the Ru-MgO interface. The degree of charge transfer depends on the AM's ionic radius and electronegativity affecting surface mobility and charge donation ability. Consequently, K+ is the best AM promoter in Ru/MgOcatalyzed aromatic hydrogenation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据