4.7 Article

Effects of ZnO nanoparticle-coated packaging film on pork meat quality during cold storage

期刊

JOURNAL OF THE SCIENCE OF FOOD AND AGRICULTURE
卷 97, 期 7, 页码 2023-2029

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/jsfa.8003

关键词

ZnO nanoparticles; low temperature; meat quality; microbiology; cell morphology

资金

  1. National 12th Five-Year Science and Technology supporting grant in China [2012BAD37B07]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [31601572]
  3. Science and Technology Department of Henan Province [152102110055]
  4. Education Department of Henan Province [17A550004, 2015GGJS-078]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

BACKGROUNDThere has been limited research on the use of ZnO nanoparticle-coated film for the quality preservation of pork meat under low temperature. In the present study, ZnO nanoparticles were mixed with sodium carboxymethyl cellulose (CMC-Na) to form a nanocomposite film, to investigate the effect of ZnO nanoparticle-coated film on pork meat quality and the growth of bacteria during storage under low temperature. RESULTSWhen ZnO nanoparticle-coated film was used as the packaging material for pork meat for 14 days of cold storage at 4 degrees C, the results demonstrated a significant effect on restricting the increases in total volatile basic nitrogen and pH levels, limiting the decreases of lightness (increased L* value) and redness (increased a* value), and maintaining the water-holding capacity compared to the control pork samples (P < 0.05). The present study also discovered that the ZnO nanoparticle-coated film restrained the increase in total plate count (TPC). When Staphylococcus aureus was used as the representative strain, scanning electron microscopy revealed that ZnO nanoparticles increased the occurrence of cell membrane rupture under cold conditions. CONCLUSIONZnO nanoparticle-coated film helps retain the quality of pork meat during cold storage by increasing the occurrence of microorganism injury. (c) 2016 Society of Chemical Industry

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据