4.5 Article

Bridge Damage Identification Using Rotation Measurement

期刊

JOURNAL OF BRIDGE ENGINEERING
卷 28, 期 5, 页码 -

出版社

ASCE-AMER SOC CIVIL ENGINEERS
DOI: 10.1061/JBENF2.BEENG-5891

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper proposes a novel bridge damage identification methodology using simulated rotation measurements. Different bridge segmentation strategies, damage scenarios, and measurement points are considered to demonstrate the detection, localization, and severity quantification capability of the proposed approach. The results indicate that the proposed method can successfully detect and localize damage, and predict the severity of the damage with reasonable accuracy.
This paper proposes a novel bridge damage identification methodology using simulated rotation measurements. To illustrate the concept, a numerical 1D beam model subject to a one-axle moving vehicle model is presented. Different bridge segmentation strategies, damage scenarios, and measurement points are considered to demonstrate the detection, localization, and severity quantification capability of the proposed approach. To extend the application to a bridge subject to a fleet of unweighed multiaxle vehicles, the proposed method is combined with an iterative Bridge Weigh-in-Motion algorithm to obtain vehicle weights, bridge damage presence, and location. The results indicate that even if the vehicle weights and damage location are unknown, the proposed method can successfully detect and localize damage. The severity of the damage can also be predicted with reasonable accuracy. Finally, the proposed damage identification system is applied to measurements simulated with a fully calibrated (using in situ measurements) 3D finite-element model of a simply supported multi-T-girder bridge. Results confirm that the proposed system can accurately and automatically detect, localize, and quantify the severity of the defect for a range of cases. DOI: 10.1061/JBENF2.BEENG-5891. (c) 2023 American Society of Civil Engineers.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据