In-vivo evaluations of bone regenerative potential of two novel bioactive glasses

Due to the aging of population, materials able to repair damaged tissues are needed. Among others, bioactive glasses (BGs) have attracted a lot of interest due to their outstanding properties both for hard and soft tissues. Here, for the first time, two new BGs, which gave very promising results in preliminary in vitro-tests, were implanted in animals in order to evaluate their regenerative potential. The new BGs, named BGMS10 and Bio_MS and containing specific therapeutic ions, were produced in granules and implanted in rabbits' femurs for up to 60 days, to test their biocompatibility and osteoconduction. Additionally, granules of 45S5 Bioglass (R) were employed and used as a standard reference for comparison. The results showed that, after 30 days, the two novel BGs and 45S5 displayed a similar behavior, in terms of bone amount, thickness of new bone trabeculae and affinity index. On the contrary, after 60 days, 45S5 granules were mainly surrounded by wide and scattered bone trabeculae, separated by large amounts of soft tissue, while in BGMS10 and Bio_MS the trabeculae were thin and uniformly distributed around the BG granules. This latter scenario could be considered as more advantageous, since the features of the two novel BG granules allowed for the neo-formation of a uniformly distributed bony trabeculae, predictive of more favorable mechanical behavior, compared to the less uniform coarse trabeculae, separated by large areas of soft tissue in 45S5 granules. Thus, BGMS10 and Bio_MS could be considered suitable products for tissue regeneration in the orthopedic and dental fields.

Automated summary

Bioactive glasses (BGs) have shown great potential as materials for tissue regeneration, and two new BGs, BGMS10 and Bio_MS, demonstrated promising results in animal implantation tests. These BGs, containing therapeutic ions, were found to be biocompatible and capable of promoting the formation of uniformly distributed bone trabeculae in the implanted site. In contrast, the comparison standard 45S5 Bioglass (R) showed less uniform and coarse trabeculae, separated by soft tissue. Therefore, BGMS10 and Bio_MS could be considered suitable for tissue regeneration in orthopedic and dental fields.