4.7 Article

Change of volatile components in six microalgae with different growth phases

期刊

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/jsfa.7794

关键词

mircroalgae; volatile components; different phases; HS-SPME-GC/MS

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [31172448]
  2. National Sparking Plan Project of China [2014GA720002]
  3. Project of Ministry of Education, China [20133305130001]
  4. Zhejiang Public Welfare Project, China [2014C32081]
  5. Zhejiang Natural Science Foundation, China [LY12D06001]
  6. Ningbo Science and Technology Research Projects, China [2013C10014, 2014C10005]
  7. Ningbo Marine Algae Biotechnology Team, China [2011B81007]
  8. K. C. Wong Magna Fund (Ningbo University)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

BACKGROUND: Head space solid-phase microextraction-gas chromatography-mass spectrometry has been applied to analyze the volatile components of six marine microalgae (Thalassiosira weissflogii, Nitzschia closterium, Chaetoceros calcitrans, Platymonas helgolandica, Nannochloropsis spp. and Dicrateria inornata) from Bacillariophyta, Chlorophyta and Chrysophyta, respectively, in different growth phases. RESULTS: All volatile compounds were identified by database searching in the NIST08 Mass Spectral Library and analyzed by principal component analysis with SIMCA-P software (Umetrics, Umea, Sweden). The results clearly revealed that the volatile components of the six microalgae were significantly different in the exponential, stationary and declining phases. Aldehydes, alkanes, some esters and dimethyl sulfide significantly changed in different growth phases. CONCLUSION: This is the first report on the comprehensive characteristics of volatile components in different microalgae and in different growth phases. The results may provide reference data for studies on the flavor of cultivated aquatic organism, odor formation in nature water, choice of feeding period and microalgae species selection for the artificial rearing of marine organisms. (C) 2016 Society of Chemical Industry

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据