4.4 Article

Trends in the incidence of major birth defects after assisted reproductive technologies in Lombardy Region, Northern Italy

期刊

出版社

SPRINGER/PLENUM PUBLISHERS
DOI: 10.1007/s10815-023-02732-z

关键词

Birth defects; Congenital malformation; ICSI; IVF; Multiple pregnancy

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A study conducted in Lombardy, Italy, revealed a decrease in the incidence of birth defects in children born after assisted reproductive technologies (ART) from 2014 to 2020, suggesting that policy changes in ART may have contributed to this positive trend.
PurposeThe incidence of birth defects is increased in children born after assisted reproductive technologies (ART). However, changes in ART over time could influence this incidence. To investigate this issue, we present the frequency and trends of birth defects in ART and natural pregnancies in Lombardy, Northern Italy, during the period 2014-2020.MethodsThis is a population-based study using automated system of healthcare utilization (HCU) databases. ART pregnancies included only those obtained with conventional IVF or ICSI. After identifying the total number of deliveries, the rate of newborns with birth defects was compared between natural and ART pregnancies. A logistic regression model was used to calculate the adjusted odd ratio (OR). Analyses were repeated for every calendar year.ResultsOverall, 508,421 deliveries were identified, of which 14,067 (2.8%) were achieved after IVF-ICSI. A decreasing trend in birth defects over time was highlighted. The adjusted OR dropped from 1.40 (95%CI: 1.03-1.91) in 2014 to 0.92 (95%CI: 0.69-1.22) in 2020. During the study period, a significant reduction in multiple pregnancy and in the ratio of ICSI to conventional IVF was also observed, explaining at least in part the positive trend observed for birth defects.ConclusionThe increased risk of birth defects in children born after IVF-ICSI is not steady over time. A decline of this risk emerged in our region. Policy changes in ART may explain this beneficial effect.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据