4.4 Article

Clinical and laboratory key performance indicators in IVF: A consensus between the Italian Society of Fertility and Sterility and Reproductive Medicine (SIFES-MR) and the Italian Society of Embryology, Reproduction and Research (SIERR)

期刊

JOURNAL OF ASSISTED REPRODUCTION AND GENETICS
卷 40, 期 6, 页码 1479-1494

出版社

SPRINGER/PLENUM PUBLISHERS
DOI: 10.1007/s10815-023-02792-1

关键词

Key performance indicators; Consensus meeting; Quality improvement; Assisted reproductive technology; Performance indicators; Recommendations

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study aims to define reliable key performance indicators (KPIs) for monitoring clinical IVF performance, and proposes a set of KPIs, performance indicators (PIs) and recommendation indicators (RIs) that encompass various essential aspects of a modern IVF clinic, including quality control and constant monitoring of clinical and embryological features. These indicators can be used to assess the quality of each center and improve the efficacy and efficiency of IVF.
PurposeInfertility is increasing worldwide, and many couples seek IVF. Clinical management and laboratory work are fundamental in the IVF journey. Therefore, the definition of reliable key performance indicators (KPIs) based on clinical and laboratory parameters, is essential for internal quality control (IQC). Laboratory performance indicators have been identified and a first attempt to also determine clinical ones has been recently published. However, more detailed indicators are required.MethodsAn Italian group of experts in Reproductive Medicine from both public and private clinics on behalf of SIFES-MR and SIERR was established to define IVF indicators to monitor clinical performance.ResultsThe working group built a consensus on a list of KPIs, performance indicators (PIs) and recommendation indicators (RIs). When deemed necessary, the reference population was stratified by woman age, response to ovarian stimulation and adoption of preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidies (PGT-A). Each indicator was scored with a value from 1 to 5 and a weighted average formula - considering all the suggested parameters-was defined. This formula generates a center performance score, indicating low, average, good, or excellent performance.ConclusionThis study is intended to provide KPIs, PIs and RIs that encompass several essential aspects of a modern IVF clinic, including quality control and constant monitoring of clinical and embryological features. These indicators could be used to assess the quality of each center with the aim of improving efficacy and efficiency in IVF.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据