4.6 Article

Ultrasound-assisted formic acid-choline chloride deep eutectic solvent pretreatment of cotton straw to extracted lignin

期刊

JOURNAL OF APPLIED POLYMER SCIENCE
卷 140, 期 30, 页码 -

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/app.54082

关键词

formic acid-choline chloride DES; lignin extraction; lignocellulosic; ultrasound-assisted

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Ultrasound-assisted deep eutectic solvent (DES) pretreatment was used to treat cotton straw to separate hemicellulose and lignin while retaining most of the cellulose. DESs were prepared with different molar ratios using choline chloride as the hydrogen bond acceptor and formic acid as the hydrogen bond donor. Changing the ultrasonic frequency and DESs synergistic extraction of lignin. The study provides a feasible method for the separation of lignocellulose.
Deep eutectic solvent (DES) is a new type of green solvent that can be used for the separation of lignocellulosic components. In this study, ultrasound-assisted DES pretreatment was used to treat cotton straw, which could retain most of the cellulose in cotton straw and separate hemicellulose and lignin at the same time. Here, DESs with different molar ratios were prepared using choline chloride as hydrogen bond acceptor and formic acid as hydrogen bond donor. Simultaneously changing the ultrasonic frequency and DESs synergistic extraction of lignin. Results show that the ultrasonic power is 32 kHz (room temperature), ultrasound 30 min, oil bath heat 3 h under the best conditions can significantly extract lignin, and the yield of lignin is 87.7% and the purity reached 97.3%. The characteristic peaks of FT-IR confirmed the extraction of lignin. The structural characteristics of 2D-HSQC also confirmed the effective separation of lignin, and x-ray diffraction (XRD) and scanning electron microscope (SEM) confirmed the effect of ultrasound-assisted DES pretreatment on lignocellulose structure. In short, this study provides a feasible method for the separation of lignocellulose.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据