4.6 Article

Sulfonated poly(ether ether ketone) membranes for vanadium redox flow battery enabled by the incorporation of ionic liquid-covalent organic framework complex

期刊

JOURNAL OF APPLIED POLYMER SCIENCE
卷 140, 期 18, 页码 -

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/app.53802

关键词

ion exchange membrane; ionic liquid; sulfonated polyether ether ketone; vanadium redox flow battery

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study improved the ion selectivity of SPEEK membrane by utilizing the Donnan effect of imidazole cations in ionic liquids and immobilizing the ionic liquids using porous covalent organic framework materials. The composite membrane exhibited improved cell performance with high coulombic and energy efficiencies. The proposed membrane is cost-effective and high-performing for vanadium redox flow batteries.
In vanadium redox flow battery (VRFB). Sulfonated poly(ether ether ketone) (SPEEK) is viewed as a promising alternative to Nafion as a material for vanadium liquid flow battery membrane, due to its low cost and high proton conductivity. However, SPEEK membranes have a Trade-Off effect of proton conduction and ion selectivity, which limits the performance of VRFB. Here, we exploited the Donnan effect of imidazole cations in ionic liquids (ILs) to improve the ion selectivity of SPEEK membrane. In addition, used porous covalent organic framework materials (COF) with sulfonic acid functional groups to immobilize ionic liquids, which reduced the loss of ILs. The ion selectivity of the SPEEK membrane was further improved. As a result, the cell performance of the composite membrane is improved. At a constant current density of 40 mA cm(-2), SPEEK/IL-5@TpPa-SO3H-3 membrane exhibits high coulombic efficiencies (CE: 98.43%) and energy efficiencies (EE: 91.7%). Furthermore, the energy efficiency of the SPEEK/IL-5@TpPa-SO3H-3 membrane decreases only 2.1% after 60 charge/discharge cycles at 100 mA cm(-2). Our work proposed a cost-effective, high-performance membrane for VRFB.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据