4.6 Article

A general framework for updating belief distributions

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1111/rssb.12158

关键词

Decision theory; General Bayesian updating; Generalized estimating equations; Gibbs posteriors; Information; Loss function; Maximum entropy; Provably approximately correct Bayes methods; Self-information loss function

资金

  1. Oxford-Man Institute, Oxford
  2. Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council [EP/K014463/1]
  3. Medical Research Council, UK [MC_UP_A390_1107]
  4. National Science Foundation [DMS 1506879]
  5. EPSRC [EP/K014463/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  6. Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council [EP/K014463/1] Funding Source: researchfish

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We propose a framework for general Bayesian inference. We argue that a valid update of a prior belief distribution to a posterior can be made for parameters which are connected to observations through a loss function rather than the traditional likelihood function, which is recovered as a special case. Modern application areas make it increasingly challenging for Bayesians to attempt to model the true data-generating mechanism. For instance, when the object of interest is low dimensional, such as a mean or median, it is cumbersome to have to achieve this via a complete model for the whole data distribution. More importantly, there are settings where the parameter of interest does not directly index a family of density functions and thus the Bayesian approach to learning about such parameters is currently regarded as problematic. Our framework uses loss functions to connect information in the data to functionals of interest. The updating of beliefs then follows from a decision theoretic approach involving cumulative loss functions. Importantly, the procedure coincides with Bayesian updating when a true likelihood is known yet provides coherent subjective inference in much more general settings. Connections to other inference frameworks are highlighted.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据