4.6 Article

A snapshot of domain evolution between topological vortex and stripe in ferroelectric hexagonal ErMnO3

期刊

JOURNAL OF APPLIED PHYSICS
卷 133, 期 12, 页码 -

出版社

AIP Publishing
DOI: 10.1063/5.0138096

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Hexagonal manganites display three distinct domain patterns: stripe, loop, and vortex. The formation and evolution of vortex networks is still a mystery due to high ferroelectric phase transition temperature and a lack of reliable visualization methods. In this study, by precisely controlling the annealing temperature at T-c, we observed the coexistence of vortices, loops, and stripes. We proposed a merging process between the V-AV pair and the stripe, resulting in two different forms of vortex networks: normal vortex and zigzag vortex. Additionally, the connection between stripe density and V-AV pair orientation, both influenced by crystal self-straining, was analyzed. Capturing this snapshot and providing the experimental database calls for further analysis to understand the evolution of different domain topologies.
Hexagonal manganites exhibit three distinct domain patterns: stripe, loop, and vortex. Due to the high ferroelectric phase transition temperature and the lack of reliable visualization methods, it is still a mystery about the evolution and the formation of vortex networks. In this study, we managed to capture the coexistence of vortices, loops, and stripes by accurately controlling the annealing temperature right at T-c. We proposed a merging process between the V-AV pair and the stripe, which result in two different forms of vortex networks, namely, the normal vortex and the zigzag vortex. In addition, the connection between the density of stripes and the orientation of V-AV pairs is analyzed, which are both influenced by self-straining of the crystal. The mystery of evolution of the vortex network is unveiled by capturing the snapshot, and the experimental database provided calls for more analysis to understand the evolution of different domain topologies.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据