4.7 Article

Development of an optimized and practical pharmacokinetics/pharmacodynamics analysis method for aztreonam/nacubactam against carbapenemase-producing K. pneumoniae

期刊

JOURNAL OF ANTIMICROBIAL CHEMOTHERAPY
卷 78, 期 4, 页码 991-999

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/jac/dkad033

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study aimed to establish a practical PK/PD analysis method to determine the practical PK/PD parameters of aztreonam/nacubactam. It was found that fT(>MICi) is the optimal PK/PD parameter for aztreonam/nacubactam and is highly correlated with in vivo bactericidal effect.
Background Nacubactam, a new beta-lactamase inhibitor with antibacterial activity, is being developed as a single drug to be co-administered with cefepime or aztreonam. However, determining pharmacokinetics/pharmacodynamics (PK/PD) parameters in beta-lactam/beta-lactamase inhibitor combinations remains challenging. We aimed to establish a practical PK/PD analysis method for aztreonam/nacubactam that incorporates instantaneous MIC (MICi). Methods Based on chequerboard MIC measurements, MICi of aztreonam against carbapenemase-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae in the presence of nacubactam was simulated. Results The mean change in the bacterial count of thigh-infected mice in an in vivo PD study was plotted based on %fT(>MICi) and analysed using the inhibitory effect sigmoid I-max model. fT(>MICi) calculated from the PK experiments showed a high correlation with the in vivo bactericidal effect, suggesting that fT(>MICi) is the optimal PK/PD parameter for aztreonam/nacubactam. The target values of fT(>MICi) achieving growth inhibition, 1 log(10) kill and 2 log(10) kill, were 22, 38% and 75%, respectively. Conclusions The PK/PD analysis method proposed in this study is promising for determining practical PK/PD parameters in combination therapy. In addition, this is the first report of aztreonam/nacubactam showing a potent in vivo therapeutic effect against NDM-producing K. pneumoniae.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据