4.5 Article

Comparing Tau PET Visual Interpretation with Tau PET Quantification, Cerebrospinal Fluid Biomarkers, and Longitudinal Clinical Assessment

期刊

JOURNAL OF ALZHEIMERS DISEASE
卷 93, 期 2, 页码 765-777

出版社

IOS PRESS
DOI: 10.3233/JAD-230032

关键词

Alzheimer's disease; cerebrospinal fluid; positron emission tomography; tauopathies

向作者/读者索取更多资源

F-18-flortaucipir PET was approved by FDA for visualizing neurofibrillary tangles in the brains of patients with cognitive impairment. Visual interpretation was found to be consistent with SUVR and moderately consistent with CSF biomarkers. However, it could not predict the clinical assessment in some cases.
Background: F-18-flortaucipir PET received FDA approval to visualize aggregated neurofibrillary tangles (NFTs) in brains of adult patients with cognitive impairment being evaluated for Alzheimer's disease (AD). However, manufacturer's guidelines for visual interpretation of F-18-flortaucipir PET differ from how F-18-flortaucipir PET has been measured in research settings using standardized uptake value ratios (SUVRs). How visual interpretation relates to F-18-flortaucipir PET SUVR, cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) biomarkers, or longitudinal clinical assessment is not well understood. Objective: We compare various diagnostic methods in participants enrolled in longitudinal observational studies of aging and memory (n = 189, 23 were cognitively impaired). Methods: Participants had tau PET, A beta PET, MRI, and clinical and cognitive evaluation within 18 months (n = 189); the majority (n = 144) also underwent lumbar puncture. Two radiologists followed manufacturer's guidelines for 18F-flortaucipir PET visual interpretation. Results: Visual interpretation had high agreement with SUVR (98.4%)and moderate agreement with CSF p-tau181 (86.1%). Two participants demonstrated 18F-flortaucipir uptake from meningiomas. Visual interpretation could not predict follow-up clinical assessment in 9.52% of cases. Conclusion: Visual interpretation was highly consistent with SUVR (discordant participants had hemorrhagic infarcts or occipital-predominant AD NFT deposition) and moderately consistent with CSF p-tau181 (discordant participants had AD pathophysiology not detectable on tau PET). However, close association between AD NFT deposition and clinical onset in group-level studies does not necessarily hold at the individual level, with discrepancies arising from atypical AD, vascular dementia, or frontotemporal dementia. A better understanding of relationships across imaging, CSF biomarkers, and clinical assessment is needed to provide appropriate diagnoses for these individuals.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据