4.6 Article

Inferring muscle functional roles of the ostrich pelvic limb during walking and running using computer optimization

期刊

出版社

ROYAL SOC
DOI: 10.1098/rsif.2016.0035

关键词

musculoskeletal model; inverse dynamics; forward dynamics; OpenSim; static optimization; computed muscle control

资金

  1. BBSRC
  2. NERC [BB/I02204X/1, NE/K004751/1]
  3. NSF
  4. Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council [BB/I02204X/1] Funding Source: researchfish
  5. Natural Environment Research Council [NE/K004751/1] Funding Source: researchfish
  6. BBSRC [BB/I02204X/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  7. NERC [NE/K004751/1] Funding Source: UKRI

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Owing to their cursorial background, ostriches (Struthio camelus) walk and run with high metabolic economy, can reach very fast running speeds and quickly execute cutting manoeuvres. These capabilities are believed to be a result of their ability to coordinate muscles to take advantage of specialized passive limb structures. This study aimed to infer the functional roles of ostrich pelvic limb muscles during gait. Existing gait data were combined with a newly developed musculoskeletal model to generate simulations of ostrich walking and running that predict muscle excitations, force and mechanical work. Consistent with previous avian electromyography studies, predicted excitation patterns showed that individual muscles tended to be excited primarily during only stance or swing. Work and force estimates show that ostrich gaits are partially hip-driven with the bi-articular hip-knee muscles driving stance mechanics. Conversely, the knee extensors acted as brakes, absorbing energy. The digital extensors generated large amounts of both negative and positive mechanical work, with increased magnitudes during running, providing further evidence that ostriches make extensive use of tendinous elastic energy storage to improve economy. The simulations also highlight the need to carefully consider non-muscular soft tissues that may play a role in ostrich gait.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据