4.7 Article

Core-shell CuCo2S4 based microspheres composited with carbon black nanoparticles for effective microwave absorption

期刊

JOURNAL OF ALLOYS AND COMPOUNDS
卷 938, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.jallcom.2022.168577

关键词

Core-shell CuCo2S4; Microwave absorption; Carbon black nanoparticles

向作者/读者索取更多资源

CuCo2S4 with core-shell structure was synthesized by ion exchange self-template method and its microwave absorption properties were studied. At 30% filling, the maximum effective bandwidth was 4.88 GHz, with the strongest absorption peak at -25.52 dB. By blending conductive carbon black nanoparticles, the maximum effective bandwidth of the CuCo2S4/C composite increased to 6.00 GHz, with a strongest absorption peak of -52.60 dB. These results indicate that the addition of conductive carbon black nanoparticles improves impedance matching and polarization loss, leading to enhanced microwave absorption performance of the samples.
CuCo2S4 with core-shell structure was prepared by ion exchange self-template method, and the microwave absorption property of CuCo2S4 with this morphology was studied. At 30% filling, the maximum effective bandwidth is 4.88 GHz (13.12-18 GHz, 2 mm), and the strongest absorption peak is - 25.52 dB (18 GHz, 1.7 mm). In order to optimize the absorption performance of core-shell CuCo2S4, conductive carbon black nanoparticles were blended with core-shell CuCo2S4 to obtain CuCo2S4/C composite. Compared with singlephase CuCo2S4 absorber, the maximum effective bandwidth of the composite increased to 6.00 GHz (12.00-18 GHz, 2 mm), and the strongest absorption peak increased to - 52.60 dB (15.42 GHz, 1.9 mm). These results demonstrated that the introduction of small amount of conductive carbon black nanoparticles not only optimize the impedance matching, but also enhance the polarization loss of the composite, therefore, comprehensively improve the microwave absorption performance of the samples.(c) 2022 Published by Elsevier B.V.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据