期刊
JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL AND FOOD CHEMISTRY
卷 -, 期 -, 页码 -出版社
AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.jafc.3c01284
关键词
CIE L*a*b*; Glories; colorimetry; colorsensory; wine color; CIEDE2000; Euclideancolor distance
This study compares the Glory method, CIE L*a*b color space, and human perception of 112 white and red wines. The results show that the CIE L*a*b color space is closer to human perception, thus recommending its use over the Glory method. The CIEDE2000 formula better expresses visual color thresholds, but they still vary depending on the color area in the CIE L*a*b color space.
The Glories methodand CIE L*a*b*color space are poorly correlated in the lightred high-saturation color area. Non-uniformities in the CIE L*a*b* color space haveled to the CIEDE2000 formula, while the Euclidean color distance isstill used in wine research. In this study, 112 white and red wineswere examined to compare the Glories method, CIE L*a*b, and human perception usingmonovarietal wines from different grape varieties. The objective ofthis study was to investigate which of the two methods and which parameterof each method better aligned with human perception. The visual colorthreshold was re-evaluated with the CIEDE2000 formula and triangletesting. CIE L*a*b* more closely matched the human perception, elevating the use ofCIE L*a*b* overthe use of the Glories method. Visual color thresholds were betterexpressed with CIEDE2000 but still varied depending upon the colorarea in the CIE L*a*b* color space.
作者
我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。
推荐
暂无数据