4.7 Article

Chemosensory Protein 2 of Male Athetis lepigone Is Involved in the Perception of Sex Pheromones and Maize Volatiles

期刊

JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL AND FOOD CHEMISTRY
卷 71, 期 16, 页码 6277-6287

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.jafc.3c00565

关键词

Athetis lepigone; chemosensory protein; sex pheromone; maize volatile; site-directed mutagenesis; RNAi

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this study, the interaction between chemosensory proteins (CSPs) and sex pheromones in moths was investigated. AlepCSP2 was found to bind strongly to two sex pheromones and five maize volatiles under neutral conditions. RNA interference (RNAi) experiments revealed that siCSP2 males had lower electro-antennography responses to sex pheromones and maize volatiles and a significantly decreased mating rate. These findings contribute to understanding the binding mechanisms of CSPs in moths and identifying targets for pest behavior disruptors.
In moths, the interactions between chemosensory proteins (CSPs) and sex pheromones have yet to be comprehensively investigated. Here, we examined the function of AlepCSP2 in male Athetis lepigone based on protein expression, molecular docking, site-directed mutagenesis, fluorescence competitive binding analyses, and RNA interference (RNAi) experiments. We found that AlepCSP2 showed strong binding affinity for two sex pheromones and five maize volatiles and that binding was optimal under neutral conditions. Furthermore, we identified six amino acids as being key residues involved in the interaction between AlepCSP2 and multiple ligands. Further RNAi showed that siCSP2 males displayed consistently lower electro-antennography responses to two sex pheromones and three maize volatiles at different dosages tested, and the mating rate also decreased significantly by 37.50%. These findings will contribute to characterizing the binding mechanisms of moth CSPs to sex pheromones and host volatiles and also identify unique targets for developing novel pest behavior disruptors.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据