4.7 Article

Importance of CYP6ER1 Was Different among Neonicotinoids in Their Susceptibility in Nilaparvata lugens

期刊

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.jafc.2c07692

关键词

Nilaparvata lugens; CYP6ER1; neonicotinoid susceptibility; metabolism; structure-dependent

向作者/读者索取更多资源

CYP6ER1 overexpression is a common mechanism for neonicotinoid resistance in Nilaparvata lugens, although the direct evidence for the metabolism of other neonicotinoids by CYP6ER1 is lacking. In this study, a CYP6ER1 knockout strain (CYP6ER1-/-) was constructed and showed higher susceptibility to imidacloprid and thiacloprid compared to the wild type strain. Recombinant CYP6ER1 exhibited the highest activity to metabolize imidacloprid and thiacloprid, indicating insecticide structure-dependent function of CYP6ER1.
CYP6ER1 overexpression is a prevalent mechanism for neonicotinoid resistance in Nilaparvata lugens. Except for imidacloprid, the metabolism of other neonicotinoids by CYP6ER1 lacked direct evidence. In this study, a CYP6ER1 knockout strain (CYP6ER1-/-) was constructed using the CRISPR/Cas9 strategy. The CYP6ER1-/- strain showed much higher susceptibility to imidacloprid and thiacloprid with an SI (sensitivity index, LC50 of WT/LC50 of CYP6ER1-/-) of over 100, which was 10-30 for four neonicotinoids (acetamiprid, nitenpyram, clothianidin, and dinotefuran) and less than 5 for flupyradifurone and sulfoxaflor. Recombinant CYP6ER1 showed the highest activity to metabolize imidacloprid and thiacloprid and moderate activity for the other four neonicotinoids. Main metabolite identification and oxidation site prediction revealed that CYP6ER1 activities were insecticide structure-dependent. The most potential oxidation site of imidacloprid and thiacloprid was located in the five-membered heterocycle with hydroxylation activity. For the other four neonicotinoids, the potential site was within the ring opening of a five-membered heterocycle, indicating N-desmethyl activity.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据