4.5 Article

Improved Ant Colony Optimization for the Operational Aircraft Maintenance Routing Problem with Cruise Speed Control

期刊

JOURNAL OF ADVANCED TRANSPORTATION
卷 2023, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

WILEY-HINDAWI
DOI: 10.1155/2023/8390619

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study focuses on the operational aircraft maintenance routing problem with cruise speed control. The goal is to minimize the quantity of required aircraft by optimizing cruise times and determining aircraft routes. The study proposes a preprocessing step to reduce the network size and an improved ant colony optimization algorithm with new mechanisms for cruise time optimization and search efficiency enhancement.
The operational aircraft maintenance routing problem (OAMRP) plays a critical part in producing considerable cost reductions for airlines, since its solution directly influences the number of operating leased aircraft. To reduce the quantity of required aircraft, adopting cruise speed control in OAMRP is a good strategy. In this paper, we investigate the OAMRP with cruise speed control. The objective is to minimize the required quantity of aircraft by finding the optimal aircraft routes through cruise time optimization. The focus is on solving two issues simultaneously: (i) optimization of cruise times and (ii) determination of aircraft routes. Since the combination of two intricate sets of decisions poses significant methodological challenges, the difficulty lies in how to efficiently solve it. Accordingly, the goal of this study is twofold: (i) to design a preprocessing step to reduce the network size and (ii) to develop an improved ant colony optimization (IACO) algorithm with a new state transition mechanism to provide the guidance for cruise times optimization and a new pheromone updating mechanism to enhance the search efficiency and precision. Using data from the Bureau of Transportation Statistics (BTS), we demonstrate the computational efficiency of the preprocessing step and the IACO algorithm.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据