4.1 Article

Deep learning reconstruction with single-energy metal artifact reduction in pelvic computed tomography for patients with metal hip prostheses

期刊

JAPANESE JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY
卷 41, 期 8, 页码 863-871

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s11604-023-01402-5

关键词

Metal artifact reduction; Metal hip prosthesis; Pelvis; Computed tomography

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the impact of deep learning reconstruction (DLR) with single-energy metal artifact reduction (SEMAR) (DLR-S) technique in pelvic helical computed tomography (CT) images for patients with metal hip prostheses, and compare it with DLR and hybrid iterative reconstruction (IR) with SEMAR (IR-S). The study concluded that DLR-S provided better image quality and reduced metal artifacts compared to DLR and IR-S.
PurposeThe aim of this study was to assess the impact of the deep learning reconstruction (DLR) with single-energy metal artifact reduction (SEMAR) (DLR-S) technique in pelvic helical computed tomography (CT) images for patients with metal hip prostheses and compare it with DLR and hybrid iterative reconstruction (IR) with SEMAR (IR-S).Materials and methodsThis retrospective study included 26 patients (mean age 68.6 +/- 16.6 years, with 9 males and 17 females) with metal hip prostheses who underwent a CT examination including the pelvis. Axial pelvic CT images were reconstructed using DLR-S, DLR, and IR-S. In one-by-one qualitative analyses, two radiologists evaluated the degree of metal artifacts, noise, and pelvic structure depiction. In side-by-side qualitative analyses (DLR-S vs. IR-S), the two radiologists evaluated metal artifacts and overall quality. By placing regions of interest on the bladder and psoas muscle, the standard deviations of their CT attenuation were recorded, and the artifact index was calculated based on them. Results were compared between DLR-S vs. DLR and DLR vs. IR-S using the Wilcoxon signed-rank test.ResultsIn one-by-one qualitative analyses, metal artifacts and structure depiction in DLR-S were significantly better than those in DLR; however, between DLR-S and IR-S, significant differences were noted only for reader 1. Image noise in DLR-S was rated as significantly reduced compared with that in IR-S by both readers. In side-by-side analyses, both readers rated that the DLR-S images are significantly better than IR-S images regarding overall image quality and metal artifacts. The median (interquartile range) of the artifact index for DLR-S was 10.1 (4.4-16.0) and was significantly better than those for DLR (23.1, 6.5-36.1) and IR-S (11.4, 7.8-17.9).ConclusionDLR-S provided better pelvic CT images in patients with metal hip prostheses than IR-S and DLR.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据