4.3 Article

The Impact of Scalp's Temperature on the Choice of the Best Layout for TTFields Treatment

期刊

IRBM
卷 44, 期 3, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.irbm.2023.100768

关键词

Finite element method; Glioblastoma; Optune; NovoTAL system; Tissue heating; Tumor treating fields

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study investigated the impact of accounting for scalp temperature during treatment planning on the choice of the best layout suggested by NovoTAL, as well as the sensitivity of the results to the evaluation criteria. The results showed that considering temperature does not significantly affect the best layout choice as long as the arrays are at least 1 cm apart. Additionally, the choice of the best layout depends on the evaluation criteria used.
Background and Objectives: Tumor Treating Fields (TTFields) is an FDA-approved technique used in the treatment of glioblastoma. It consists in applying an electric field (EF) with a frequency of 200 kHz using two pairs of transducer arrays. During treatment planning, the NovoTAL system is used to strategically place the arrays on the head in regions that maximize the EF at the tumor. Current should be injected at least 18 hours/day and induce a minimum EF of 1 V/cm at the tumor. To avoid any thermal harm to the patient, the temperature of the scalp is kept around 39.5 degrees C by changing the injected current. The goal of this study was to investigate how accounting for the temperature of the scalp during treatment planning might affect the choice of the best layout suggested by NovoTAL. Furthermore, we also studied the sensitivity of the results to the metric used to evaluate the layouts. Methods: We used a realistic head model with a virtual glioblastoma in our studies. Through the NovoTAL system we obtained five realistic array layouts and we predicted the best one for our model based on the approach currently implemented in this system. We then repeated the same type of analysis, but also accounting for the temperature during planning. In both cases we ranked the layouts based on three different criteria: the LMiPD and the LAPD (local minimum and local average power densities, respectively) in the tumor and the SAR (specific absorption rate) in the head Results: Accounting for the temperature does not significantly affect the choice of the best layout provided that the arrays are at least 1 cm apart from each other. Otherwise, a common temperature hotspot occurs in the scalp between the closest transducers of the adjacent arrays, which limits how much current can be injected and consequently treatment effectiveness. Also, the choice of the best layout depends on the criterion used.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据